In that section you will find research articles (in chronological order) about gender equality in physics to gain a comprehensive understanding of the intricacies and complexities surrounding this topic. Have a nice reading!
INFORM
Data, statistics and information about gender equality in physics
Emergence of group size disparity in growing networks with adoption
Sun, J., & Karimi, F. (2024). Emergence of group size disparity in growing networks with adoption. Communications Physics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01799-z
Gender gap in STEM education and career choices: what matters?
Tandrayen‐Ragoobur, V., & Gokulsing, D. (2021). Gender gap in STEM education and career choices: what matters? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(3), 1021–1040. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-09-2019-0235
Matheuses - Les filles, avenir des mathématiques
Marc, C., Perronnet, C., & Paris-Romaskevich, O. (2024). Matheuses - Les filles, avenir des mathématiques. CNRS éditions.
The Matilda Effect in Communication Research: The Effects of Gender and Geography on Usage and Citations Across 11 Countries
Rajkó, A., Herendy, C., Goyanes, M., & Demeter, M. (2023). The Matilda Effect in Communication Research: The Effects of Gender and Geography on usage and citations across 11 countries. Communication Research, 009365022211243. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221124389
Sexism in academia is bad for science and a waste of public funding
Boivin, N., Täuber, S., Beisiegel, U., Keller, U., & Hering, J. G. (2023). Sexism in academia is bad for science and a waste of public funding. Nature Reviews Materials, 9(1), 1‑3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-023-00624-3
The only woman
Humes, I. (2022). The only woman. Phaidon Press.
Getting to Diversity : What Works and What Doesn’t
Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2022). Getting to Diversity : What Works and What Doesn’t. Harvard University Press.
Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions
Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Chang, W. K., Cross, Z. R., Dominguez-Faus, R., Flinker, A., Fonken, Y. M., Gorenstein, M. A., Holdgraf, C., Hoy, C. W., Ivanova, M. V., Jimenez, R., Jun, S., Kam, J. W. Y., Kidd, C., Marcelle, E. T.,. . . Dronkers, N. F. (2021). Gender bias in academia : A lifetime problem that needs solutions. Neuron, 109(13), 2047‑2074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002
Trends in gender pay gaps of scientists and engineers in academia and industry
Ding, W. W., Ohyama, A., & Agarwal, R. (2021). Trends in gender pay gaps of scientists and engineers in academia and industry. Nature Biotechnology, 39(8), 1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01008-0
Turning Chutes into Ladders for Women Faculty: A Review and Roadmap for Equity in Academia
Cardel, M. I., Dhurandhar, E. J., Yarar‐Fisher, C., Foster, M., Hidalgo, B., McClure, L. A., Pagoto, S. L., Brown, N. P., Pekmezi, D., Sharafeldin, N., Willig, A. L., & Angelini, C. (2020). Turning Chutes into Ladders for Women Faculty : A Review and Roadmap for Equity in Academia. Journal Of Womens Health, 29(5), 721‑733. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.8027
Gender in the Twenty-First Century
Bertrand, M. (2020). Gender in the Twenty-First Century. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 110, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201126
Boys lag behind: How teachers’ gender biases affect student achievement
Terrier, C. (2020). Boys lag behind: How teachers’ gender biases affect student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 77, 101981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.101981
Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox
Breda, T., Jouini, E., Napp, C., & Thebault, G. (2020). Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(49), 31063–31069. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008704117
Undoing Gender in Academia: Personal Reflections on Equal Opportunity Schemes
Täuber, S. (2019). Undoing Gender in Academia: Personal Reflections on Equal Opportunity schemes. Journal of Management Studies, 57(8), 1718–1724. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12516
Parental Occupational Choice and Children’s Entry into a STEM Field
Zamarro, G., Kopotic, K., & Cheng, A. (2019). Parental Occupational Choice and Children’s Entry into a STEM Field. EDRE Working Paper No. 2019-16.
Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex
Crenshaw, K. W. (2018). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex : A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics [1989]. Dans Routledge eBooks (p. 57‑80). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500480-5
Societal inequalities amplify gender gaps in math
Breda, T., Jouini, E., & Napp, C. (2018). Societal inequalities amplify gender gaps in math. Science, 359(6381), 1219–1220. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar2307
Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests
Bian, L., Leslie, S., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389‑391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524
The Math Gender Gap: The Role of Culture
Nollenberger, N., Rodríguez‐Planas, N., & Sevilla, A. (2016). The math Gender Gap: The role of culture. the American Economic Review, 106(5), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161121
A singularly unfeminine profession : One Woman’s Journey in Physics
Gaillard, M. K. (2015). A singularly unfeminine profession : One Woman’s Journey in Physics. World Scientific.
Women in science: career processes and outcomes
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in Science : Career Processes and Outcomes.
The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science
Rossiter, M. W. (1993). The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science. Social Studies Of Science, 23(2), 325‑341. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004
The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science (2)
Rossiter, M. W. (1993). The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science. Social Studies Of Science, 23(2), 325‑341. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004