Diversity definitely adds value
Today, Angelique Sanchez is discussing with Anna Sanpera
Anna Sanpera
Anna Sanpera Trigueros is an ICREA Research Professor at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, specializing in quantum information, atomic physics, condensed matter, and statistical physics. Her research focuses on the unique properties of ultracold atomic gases, entanglement theory, and quantum neural networks. Previously a research fellow at Leibniz University in Hannover, where she habilitated in 2002, she has held her current position since 2005. Anna is also committed to education and the popularization of science, bridging advanced quantum research and public understanding.
How did the manifesto come about?
The manifesto was the result of over a year and a half of discussions and two major meetings. It wasn’t easy; it took a long time to craft something that simply calls for dialogue. It’s not a solution; it’s an invitation to the scientific community to talk about the things we see that can be improved.
You mentioned that this manifesto benefits all genders, could you elaborate on that?
Yes, many men don’t feel represented by the current model of a scientific career either. The high competitiveness can be alienating for them as well. The manifesto isn’t just for women; it’s about creating space for everyone to discuss the existing system and its flaws.
Has it been well-received so far?
As a physicist, how would an initiative like W4Q have helped you when you started your career?
For me personally, it might be too late—I'm already established in my career. But I think initiatives like this are incredibly important for the next generation of female scientists. I talk to young women who are doing their PhDs, and many of them are considering leaving science. It’s a common story. They find it hard to balance their work with personal life, and it’s tough. These initiatives can offer them the support I didn’t have.
Do you think young women in science today are aware of the gender issues in their field?
That’s a tricky one. Some are aware, but many don’t see it—at least not until later in their careers. When I was younger, I didn’t think gender inequality was an issue either. When I speak with these young women, they often say they’re leaving science because it’s too demanding, not necessarily because they recognize the subtle gender disparities. Those differences are often invisible at first.
Are you happy with your job?
Yes, I love my job. It’s intellectually challenging, and I get to work with bright young people. I enjoy mentoring them, not just in physics, but in broader ways—discussing philosophy, art, and how to approach problems. I find it incredibly rewarding to be surrounded by young minds, full of ideas and creativity.
Is it challenging to always work with young people, especially as they bring new ideas and perspectives?
I see it as a privilege. It keeps me on my toes. Yes, it can be demanding, but it’s also incredibly refreshing. I get to help shape how they think about science and the world, and in return, I learn from them. It’s a constant exchange, which is one of the best parts of my job.
How important is diversity in your scientific work?
Diversity definitely adds value. In my research group, we have 13 nationalities, and that brings a richness of perspectives. While you can certainly do good science without diversity—it’s been done for centuries—it’s less creative, less interesting. Diversity opens your mind to different ways of solving problems, and it creates a more open, comfortable environment for everyone.
Finally, do you think the world would benefit from more women in leadership roles?
Absolutely. I often joke that if women ran the world for the next 200 years, things would improve dramatically. Of course, not all women are perfect, but the way we approach problems is different—more about dialogue, less about conflict. You saw it during the pandemic, with how women leaders managed the crisis. I think it’s time for change.
Thank you :)